When it comes to mobile CPUs, Intel’s 14th Gen Meteor Lake is undeniably a leap forward. Intel not only revamped its naming convention but also improved multi-thread and single-thread CPU performance, GPU performance, and more.
With the launch of Core Ultra, Intel has given its latest chipsets a premium treatment to make them stand out. Eager to test this new offering, I recently acquired an Intel Core Ultra 7 155H through a Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro. To gauge its performance, I decided to gather some benchmarks for the Intel Core 7 155H Ultra. Here’s what I discovered.
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro Specifications
Before diving into the tests, it’s important to note that I’ve compared this chipset with its close AMD counterpart, the Ryzen 7 8845HS. This comparison will provide a clearer picture of the performance metrics. Now, let’s take a quick look at the specifications of the system I’m using for these tests:
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Benchmarks: 3D Mark
Let’s start with 3DMark, renowned for its comprehensive GPU/CPU performance benchmarks.
CPU Profile
3DMark’s CPU Profile test stresses all CPU threads to assess their performance under load. During the 10-minute 3DMark test, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H delivered a total score of 6806 points in Max threads and 5890 points in 16 Threads. Additionally, it achieved scores of 4584 points in 8 threads, 3077 points in 4 threads, 1780 points in 2 threads, and finally, 971 points in a single thread.
As of now, we haven’t obtained a reliable CPU profile score for the Ryzen 7 8845HS. However, we will update this information if and when we do.
3D Mark Time Spy
The 3DMark Time Spy score assesses the integrated GPU capabilities of CPUs. The Intel Arc iGPU of the Core Ultra 7 155H scored 3811 points, surpassing the Radeon 780M of the Ryzen 7 8845HS, which scored 2911 points.
Geekbench 6
While 3DMark focuses more on GPU performance, Geekbench 6 is more CPU-centric. Fortunately, the Core Ultra 7 is not far behind in this aspect. In the Multi-Core test, the Intel CPU scored 12433 points, compared to the Ryzen CPU’s score of 11355.
This represents approximately an 8.7% increase over the Intel Core 7 Ultra. Specifically, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scored 2384 points in the single-core test, while the Ryzen 7 achieved 2426 points.
OpenCL
The Intel Arc Xe iGPU of the Core 7 Ultra 155H achieved a score of 33919 points in Geekbench OpenCL, outperforming the Ryzen 7 8845HS’ Radeon 780M, which scored 30174 points, representing an 11% decrease.
Vulkan
In the Geekbench Vulkan scores, the Core 7 Ultra’s Intel Arc iGPU scored 35427 points, surpassing the Ryzen 7 8845HS’ Radeon 780M, which scored 33758 points. This indicates that the Arc iGPU performs 4.8% better than the Radeon 780M.
Cinebench
For the Cinebench benchmarks, I ran both the 2024 and R23 versions, and while the Core Ultra 7 155H understandably lagged behind, the difference wasn’t significant.
In the Cinebench R23 Single Core test, the Core Ultra 7 155H scored 1763 points, slightly edging out the Ryzen 7 8845HS’ score of 1757 points. In the multi-core tests, however, the Core Ultra 7 scored 13103 points, falling short of the Ryzen 7’s 15930 points.
In the Cinebench 2024 test, both the Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen 7 8845HS scored 102 points in the Single Core test.
The 155H achieved a score of 728 points in the Multi-Core test, while the 8845HS scored 902 points, making the 8845HS about 24% more efficient than the 155H in this aspect.
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: PCMark 10
Although the 3DMark CPU Profile and Time Spy tests provide a good indication of a CPU’s performance, I also conducted the PCMark 10 benchmark for a more comprehensive analysis. This benchmark evaluates a CPU based on three categories: Essentials, Productivity, and Digital Content Creation, and assigns a score accordingly, influencing the overall PCMark 10 score.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scored 6860 points in this test, which is considered quite impressive. Any CPU surpassing 5000 points in PCMark 10 is commendable in my opinion. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find the Ryzen 7 8845HS’ score for this benchmark. I’ll continue to search for it, and once I find it, I’ll update it here.
CrossMark
Similar to PCMark 10, the CrossMark benchmark helps evaluate the productivity capabilities of CPUs. It provides an overall score based on Productivity, Creativity, and Responsiveness parameters, which should be taken into consideration.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H achieved a score of 1674 points in this test, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS scored 1810 points. This indicates that the latter performs 8% better than the former in this benchmark.
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Power Efficiency
With the Core Ultra 7 benchmarks completed, it was time to assess the power efficiency of the Core Ultra 7 155H. At the start of the laptop drain test, the battery level was at 93%. Before delving into the details, here are the settings I used on the Galaxy Book4 Pro:
1. Brightness set to 50%
2. Display resolution at 2880 x 1800
3. Color profile set to Samsung’s default Auto mode
4. Samsung’s proprietary performance mode is set to Silent
5. Windows’ performance mode set to Balanced
6. Dynamic Refresh Rate enabled
With these settings, I downloaded Control and GTA V while streaming a 5-hour-long 4K video on YouTube. By 3:28 PM, the battery had depleted to 48%, and by 5:34 PM, it had reached 5%.
After fully charging the laptop, I let it sleep for approximately 6.5 hours, during which it only lost 6% of its battery. Considering these results, you can expect around 12-13 hours of battery life during typical office or personal usage. This is excellent and demonstrates the Core Ultra 7’s impressive power efficiency.
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Gaming Performance
When it comes to gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 7’s Intel Arc iGPU holds its own. While it might struggle with running Baldur’s Gate 3 at maximum settings, you can easily enjoy games like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant without any issues. I also tested it with Control, an AAA title, and it handled it quite well. Here’s a brief summary of the gaming results:
Verdict: How Good Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?
After reviewing the benchmarks for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, one thing is evident: if you’re looking for top-notch performance and are willing to invest in it, the Core Ultra 7 is a solid choice. While it may not offer a significant improvement in single and multi-core performance over the previous generation’s Intel i7 13700H, its integrated GPU is where it truly shines.
The Intel ARC iGPU delivers an impressive 60-70% performance boost compared to the Iris Xe, which is quite remarkable. Moreover, the Core Ultra 7’s power efficiency brings Windows remarkably close to matching the MacBook in this aspect.
The Core Ultra 7 155H in the Galaxy Book4 Pro offers an impressive 12+ hours of battery life, which is truly commendable. Whether you’re engaging in heavy editing, multitasking, or even 1080p gaming, the Core Ultra 7 is more than capable of handling these tasks.
Additionally, its integrated iGPU often outperforms the Radeon 780M in various scenarios. Considering all its capabilities, I believe the Core Ultra 7 justifies its price tag.
What are your thoughts on the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s performance? Share them in the comments below!
0 Comments